።
76
Superintendent of Police, and I think that there is little doubt that if the accountant had attempted to embezzle public funds he would have been at once detected.
4.
It seems fairly clear that it was after Mr. Messer had left the Police Department and had become Treasurer that, owing to financial embarrassment caused by reckless speculation, the accountant resorted to embezzle- ment of public funds. It is impossible to tell exactly when the first lapse came. Mr. Wolfe was extremely busy re-
organising the department after the war and was absent from headquarters constantly in different parts of the Colony, and he could not give the same close personal attention to 1 the various accounts as Mr. Messer did. Chan Pui was
trusted implicitly and by delaying payment of large accounts was able to carry over a deficit. Mr. Messer as Treasurer
at once noticed that vouchers were not being returned within
the usual period and sent reminders to the Captain Superintendent of Police which probably Chan Pui managed to
suppress, but the monthly bills were so large that by a
comparatively short delay the accountant was able to have
in his hands at any given time a considerable sum of money. It appears now that a large proportion of the sum embezzled
was taken by Chan Pui during the six months before he
absconded. When it is realised that the total of the
cheques sent to the Police Department in November 1919
amounted to $98,000, and that Chan Pui absconded on the
29th November, I should be inclined to say that the bulk of the money was taken in the last few weeks. The audit haa
not discovered whether this is so or not, but it is clear
that nothing but the closest day to day supervision of the
accountant, who was at his wits end for money and had the
opportunity of getting it into his possession for a short
time, would have prevented the embezzlement.
5.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.